Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management

CMS in Public Administration: A Comparative Analysis
Daniela Louraço 1, Célio Gonçalo Cardoso Marques 2 3 4 *
More Detail
1 MSc Management, Instituto Politécnico de Tomar
2 TECHM&ART, Instituto Politécnico de Tomar
3 CAPP - Centro de Administração e Políticas Públicas, Universidade de Lisboa
4 LABTE - Laboratório de Tecnologia Educativa, Universidade de Coimbra
* Corresponding Author
Research Article

Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 2022 - Volume 7 Issue 1, Article No: 11688
https://doi.org/10.55267/iadt.07.11688

Published Online: 31 Jan 2022

Views: 361 | Downloads: 266

How to cite this article
APA 6th edition
In-text citation: (Louraço & Marques, 2022)
Reference: Louraço, D., & Marques, C. G. C. (2022). CMS in Public Administration: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 7(1), 11688. https://doi.org/10.55267/iadt.07.11688
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Louraço D, Marques CGC. CMS in Public Administration: A Comparative Analysis. J INFORM SYSTEMS ENG. 2022;7(1):11688. https://doi.org/10.55267/iadt.07.11688
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Louraço D, Marques CGC. CMS in Public Administration: A Comparative Analysis. J INFORM SYSTEMS ENG. 2022;7(1), 11688. https://doi.org/10.55267/iadt.07.11688
Chicago
In-text citation: (Louraço and Marques, 2022)
Reference: Louraço, Daniela, and Célio Gonçalo Cardoso Marques. "CMS in Public Administration: A Comparative Analysis". Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management 2022 7 no. 1 (2022): 11688. https://doi.org/10.55267/iadt.07.11688
Harvard
In-text citation: (Louraço and Marques, 2022)
Reference: Louraço, D., and Marques, C. G. C. (2022). CMS in Public Administration: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 7(1), 11688. https://doi.org/10.55267/iadt.07.11688
MLA
In-text citation: (Louraço and Marques, 2022)
Reference: Louraço, Daniela et al. "CMS in Public Administration: A Comparative Analysis". Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, vol. 7, no. 1, 2022, 11688. https://doi.org/10.55267/iadt.07.11688
ABSTRACT
There is a wide variety of content management systems (CMS) available on the market, each with its characteristics, advantages and disadvantages, but the open source, such as Joomla, WordPress and Drupal are the ones who stand out, not only because they are free, but also because of their versatility and contemporaneity, in issues such as: ease of use, possibility of customization, support, security, adaptability and amount of resources available (modules, components and plugins). These solutions have an extremely relevant aspect for public organizations, bringing citizens and businesses closer to their governments, by providing a more direct and intuitive access to government information and services (Fang, 2002). To achieve the benefits of its implementation, it is necessary an analysis of the solutions available on the market and which ones are best suited to certain management objectives. Through a comparison of data and information collected, it is highlighted the advantages and disadvantages of each of the three CMS mentioned, especially which one is most indicated for a specific context of application and project typology in public administration, using for these rankings of use and popularity on platforms such as W3Techs and BuiltWith, as well as a set of supporting documentation.
KEYWORDS
REFERENCES
  • Aledo-Hernández, A.-J., Guillen-Pérez, A., Martinez-Caro, J.-M., Sánchez-Iborra, R., & Cano, M.-D. (2017). Sistemas de gestión de contenido web: Uso y estudio comparativo inicial de su seguridad. XIII Jornadas de Ingenieria Telematica - JITEL2017, (pp. 86-92). Valencia.
  • Badke, W. (2010). Content, content everywhere. Onlinemag, pp. 52-55.
  • Balasubramanian, S., Venkataramanan, K., & Durbha, K. (2017). Running at the Speed of Digital: Hyper-Digital Information Management. Cognizant.
  • Baptista, M. R. (2014). Estudo Comparativo de CMSs. Master Thesis, Universidade da Madeira, Centro de Competência de Ciências Exactas e da Engenharia.
  • Bárcia, L. (2011). A utilização da plataforma Joomla! na escola. Master Thesis, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Ciências da Educação.
  • Barker, D. (2016). Web Content Management. Sebastopol: O'Reilly Media, Inc.
  • Benitez, C. J. (2017, November 20). Comparar Top 3 CMS (2017): WordPress vs. Joomla vs. Drupal. Retrieved June 20, 2020, from Web Hosting Secret Revealed: https://www.webhostingsecretrevealed.net/pt/blog/web-tools/compare-top-3-cms-2017-wordpress-vs-joomla-vs-drupal/
  • Boiko, B. (2005). Content Management Bible. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Bonfield, B., & Quinn, L. S. (2007). Comparing Open Source CMSes: Joomla, Drupal and Plone. Retrieved March 26, 2019, from Idealware: shorturl.at/nMOP0
  • BuiltWith. (2020, July 24). BuiltWith. Retrieved July 24, 2020, from Joomla! Usage Statistics: https://trends.builtwith.com/cms/Joomla!
  • Byron, A., Berry, A., & Bondt, B. D. (2012). Using Drupal (2ª ed.). Sebastopol, EUA: O'Reilly.
  • Campos, R., & Marques, C. (2006). O Governo Electrónico e os Sistemas de Informação Públicos em Portugal. Actas da 1. ª Conferência de sistemas e Tecnologias de Informação (CISTI 2006), (pp. 421-437).
  • CIMLT. (2011, December 28). CIMLT. Retrieved August 27, 2020, from Lezíria do Tejo tem nova imagem na Internet: shorturl.at/drE59
  • CIMLT. (2011, October 7). Prestação de Serviços para Reestruturação dos Sites da CIMLT, Municípios Associados e do Portal do Ribatejo Digital. Retrieved August 25, 2020, from Base: contratos públicos online: shorturl.at/uPTW4
  • CIMLT. (2015, January 16). CIMLT melhora sites dos Municípios associados. Retrieved August 27, 2020, from CIMLT: shorturl.at/aciuK
  • CIMLT. (2019, January). Atualização de páginas de Internet. Retrieved August 27, 2020, from Base: contratos públicos online: shorturl.at/dCTU8
  • CIMLT. (2019). CIMLT. Retrieved August 25, 2020, from CIMLT melhora sites dos Municípios associados: shorturl.at/oHS35
  • Cruz, T. (2007). Fundamentos da gestão de conhecimento. Rio de Janeiro: Editora E-papers.
  • CULT. (2007). Projecto Ribatejo Digital. In CULT, 20 anos de associativismo municipal na Lezíria do Tejo (pp. 100-105). Forad’oras Lda.
  • Drupal. (2020, July 20). Casos de Uso. Retrieved July 20, 2020, from Drupal: https://drupal.pt/
  • Falcão, R. L., Monteiro, M. H., & Marques, C. G. (2014). O nível de qualidade oferecido pelos serviços eletrónicos na Administração Pública Local em Portugal. Um caso de estudo na NUTS II - Lisboa. 14ª Conferência da Associação Portuguesa de Sistemas de Informação (CAPSI 2014), (pp. 225-248).
  • Fang, Z. (2002). E-Government in Digital Era: Concept, Practice and Development. International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management, 10(2), 1-22.
  • Ferreira, F. G., & Glanzmann, J. H. (2011). Sistemas de Gestão de Conteúdo: Comparativo – Drupal x Joomla! CES Revista, 25, pp. 191-206.
  • Hackos, J. T. (2001). Content Management for Dynamic Web Delivery. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Hartman, E. (2011, July 21). Master Your Content Using the Content Management Lifecycle. Retrieved September 21, 2019, from CMS Wire: shorturl.at/imnC5
  • Harwani, B. M. (2009). Chapter 1: Introduction to Joomla! In B. M. Harwani, Foundation Joomla! (pp. 1-10). New York: Friendsof.
  • Heckman, J. M., & Glantz, E. J. (2003, July). Review of "web content management: A collaborative approach" by Nakano, Russell Addison Wesley, Boston, 2002. Information Processing and Management: an International Journal, 39(4), 667-668.
  • Iqbal, M., Noman, M., Talpu, S. R., Manzoor, A., & Abid, M. M. (2020, May). An empirical study of popular content management system - Wordpress vs Drupal vs Joomla. ICTACT Journal on Management Studies, 6(2), pp. 1214-1219.
  • Keßler, S., & Alpar, P. (2009). Customization of Open Source Software in Companies. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 299, pp. 129-142.
  • Lazarica, M., & Dediu, F. (2013). Content Management Systems (CMS) Open Source Websites. Management Strategies Journal, 19, pp. 75-82.
  • Lopes, M. (2005, August 11). Portal Ribatejo Digital apresentado em Santarém. Retrieved August 28, 2020, from Tinta Fresca: shorturl.at/bnMO1
  • Louraço, D. (2020). A aceitação dos Sistemas de Gestão de Conteúdos nos Municípios: Um estudo na Comunidade Intermunicipal da Lezíria do Tejo. Master Thesis, Instituto Politécnico de Tomar - Escola Superior de Gestão, Tomar.
  • Marriott, J., & Waring, E. (2011). The Official Joomla!™ Book. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
  • Melitski, J. (2001, December 10). The World of Egovernment and E-governance. Retrieved December 27, 2019, from http://www.aspanet.org/solutions/TheWorld of E-government and Egovernance.htm.
  • Molina, M. P., & Camarero, C. G. (2004). La ciberadministración española en la sociedad de la información: retos y perspectivas. Ediciones Trea.
  • Moore, G. (2014). Transforming Local Councils in Australia: Information Management in the Digital Age. Australia: TechnologyOne. Retrieved September 21, 2019, from shorturl.at/cqvTU
  • Palmisano, A., & Rosini, A. M. (2003). Capítulo 1 - Abordagens Sistêmicas. In A. Palmisano, & A. M. Rosini, Administração de Sistemas de Informação e a Gestão do Conhecimento (pp. 1-56). São Paulo: Pioneira Thomson Learning.
  • Patel, S. K., Rathod, D. V., & Prajapati, J. B. (2011, May). Performance Analysis of Content Management Systems- Joomla, Drupal and WordPress. International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887), XXI(4), pp. 39-43.
  • Patel, S. K., Rathod, V. R., & Patel, N. A. (2010). Open Source CMS Selection - A Mystery. International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering (IJCSE), pp. 24-28.
  • Patel, S. K., Rathod, V., & Parikh, S. (2011). Joomla. Drupal and WordPress - A Statistical Comparison of Open Source CMS. 3rd International Conference on Trendz in Information Sciences & Computing (TISC2011), (pp. 182-187). Chennai, India.
  • Pullman, G., & Baotung, G. (2017). Content Management: Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.
  • Ribatejo Digital. (2002). Ribatejo Digital. Retrieved August 28, 2020, from https://www.cimlt.eu/todos-os-documentos/118-revista-ribatejo-digital/file
  • Rockley, A., & Cooper, C. (2003). Managing Enterprise Content: A Unified Content Strategy (2ª ed.). Berkeley: New Riders.
  • Shah, R. V. (2012). Building a web content management system. Master Thesis, Faculty of San Diego State University.
  • Silva, A. M., & Ribeiro, F. (2009, November). A gestão da informação na administração pública. Administração Pública Interface, pp. 32-39.
  • Srivastav, M. K., & Nath, A. (2016, March). Web content management system. International Journal of Innovative Research in Advanced Engineering (IJIRAE), III, pp. 51-56.
  • Svärd, P. (2017). e-Government developmentnd its impact on information management. In Enterprise Content Management, Records Management and Information Culture Amidst E-Government Development (pp. 1-10). Cambridge: Chandos Publishing.
  • Talixa, J. (2002, November 18). Ribatejo Digital vai servir de experiência-piloto para o resto do país. Retrieved August 28, 2020, from Público: https://www.publico.pt/2002/11/18/jornal/ribatejo-digital-vai-servir-de-experienciapiloto-para-o-resto-do-pais-176648
  • Townsend, J. J., Riz, D., & Schaffer, D. (2004). Content Management. In Building Portals, Intranets, and Corporate Web Sites Using Microsoft Servers (pp. 279-311). Boston: Addison-Wesley Professional.
  • Vliet, T. V. (2007). Proprietary Dynamic Web Design vs a CMS. Bachelor, Katholieke Hogeschool Kempen, Electronica-ICT.
  • W3Techs. (2020, July 24). Usage of content management systems broken down by ranking. Retrieved July 24, 2020, from W3Techs: shorturl.at/aeM47
LICENSE
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.